Data, access and approval
Scope the customer workflow and its evidence before connecting production. Define the sources, identities, access boundaries and approval owner for each step.
Start with evidence
The published Tensile security process prefers least-privilege exports or read-only paths. Customer traces and working papers are engagement evidence, rather than marketing material. Agree source scope and complete security review before production access.
Separate execution authority
Qualify the environment and tool operations separately. Document which identities may act, which records may change and which actions require an owner decision. Repository changes, provider calls and production release need their own scope.
Engagement-specific terms
Retention, residency, hosting, provider use, deletion and write access must be settled for the actual deployment and agreement. This website preview establishes none of those commitments and makes no certification claim.
Read the published privacy summary ↗
Company and contact
For the current security and data-processing review packet, contact hello@withtensile.com. The preview uses fictional records and does not connect to customer systems.
Request the review packet ↗
Start with an affected customer job, the expected result and the evidence your team would accept.
Discuss a concrete workflow ↗
AI reliability, from production to customer outcome.