Investigate / Business questions, answered with evidence

Understand the failure before you change the agent.

Understand the failure before you change the agent.

Understand the failure before you change the agent.

Turn a complaint, recurring finding or open business question into a repeatable investigation. Bring the agent’s actions and the customer’s intended behavior together. Keep the reasoning, evidence and human decisions connected.

Tensile / Document review

A missing finding can be a bigger failure than a noisy one.

A missing finding can be a bigger failure than a noisy one.

A missing finding can be a bigger failure than a noisy one.

Question

Why is the required signature absent from the review?

Expected path

Current file → complete extraction → applicable policy → obligation assessed

Observed path

Source region changed → field absent from extraction → checklist never sees it

Illustrative records · proposed experience

Open the records. Challenge the result.

Open the records. Challenge the result.

Open the records. Challenge the result.

Tensile / Product explorerInteractive concept · invented records
Case I-104
Same question and evidence across the journey.
Investigate / I-104 / Run v1

Why did the review miss a required signature?

Run skill v1
Finding · ObservedThe extraction was incomplete. A clean finding queue could not establish a complete review.

Cause hypothesis: The extraction region still matches the previous document layout.

Business expectation

Assess every required signature against the applicable file, policy and party.

Human decision

A chat suggestion is awaiting an explicit owner choice.

Confirm creates a local concept link. It does not approve, activate or execute an Evaluation.

Clickable product concept · invented records · no external execution.

A closer look / illustrative case

A missing finding can be a bigger failure than a noisy one.

A missing finding can be a bigger failure than a noisy one.

A missing finding can be a bigger failure than a noisy one.

A document reviewer sees a clean queue. An independent whole-file review finds a required signature that never reached that queue. Investigate traces the omission to the extraction stage before changing the checklist.

Question

Why is the required signature absent from the review?

Expected path

Current file → complete extraction → applicable policy → obligation assessed

Observed path

Source region changed → field absent from extraction → checklist never sees it

Evidence

File revision F-18/4, extraction X-18, policy P-3 and obligation inventory

Owner decision

Retain this obligation; scope reviewer dismissal separately from correctness

Retained lesson

Test whole-file coverage and valid completed files before reusing the fix

The missing field is observed. “The extraction region uses the old layout” remains a cause hypothesis until the relevant configuration is inspected.

Question → skill

Give the investigation a precise job.

Give the investigation a precise job.

Give the investigation a precise job.

Capture the business question, branches and expected customer-agent behavior. Build a constrained skill using permitted traces, repository context, policies, website and documents. Keep business intent separate from the analytical method.

— Explicit inputs and unavailable sources

— Editable, versioned skill definitions

— Every run pins the skill, decisions, sources and cutoff

Expected ↔ observed

See the gap in the customer’s journey.

See the gap in the customer’s journey.

See the gap in the customer’s journey.

Inspect what the agent received, did and returned. Compare the expected path with the observed path. Open the exact event or artifact behind a divergence. A warning, a hypothesis and a proven breach keep their own meaning.

— Summary for the finding and useful next action

— Trajectory for the customer agent’s execution

— Evidence for the selected finding, not a generic log dump

Discuss → decide → rerun

Make a correction without rewriting history.

Make a correction without rewriting history.

Make a correction without rewriting history.

Ask follow-up questions in context. Record an explicit human decision with its owner and scope. Revise the skill or inputs, then rerun. Compare the new findings with the saved version and its original evidence.

— Separate questions, hypotheses and accepted decisions

— Inputs, Runs, Decisions and Learnings on the skill

— Earlier runs never inherit later evidence or corrections

Confirm → Evaluations

Turn an accepted finding into ongoing protection.

Turn an accepted finding into ongoing protection.

Turn an accepted finding into ongoing protection.

Carry the finding and its exact origin into the Pack → Evaluation → Checks workflow. Review examples, validate the expectation and choose how it should run. Keep assignment and issue links attached to the work.

— Retain the Investigation-to-Evaluation link

— Reuse or create the relevant Evaluation and Checks

— Confirmation does not silently approve or activate a definition

Continue into Evaluations ↗

Three judgments that must never collapse.

Three judgments that must never collapse.

Three judgments that must never collapse.

Record

What it answers

What changes next

Record: Finding

What it answers: What happened, supported by which evidence?

What changes next: Review the exact source and gap.

Record: Owner decision

What it answers: What should happen for this customer and policy?

What changes next: Save scope, owner and effective version.

Record: Learning

What it answers: Should this lesson shape future work?

What changes next: Test counterexamples before promotion; retain rollback.

What your team gets

The work stays useful after the first fix.

The work stays useful after the first fix.

The work stays useful after the first fix.

01

Investigation record

Investigation record

Investigation record

Question, expectation, sources, cutoff, findings and open uncertainty.

02

Versioned method

Versioned method

Versioned method

A constrained skill with inputs, runs, accepted decisions and candidate lessons.

03

Ongoing protection

Ongoing protection

Ongoing protection

An origin-linked draft Evaluation that needs its own validation and activation.

Make one important workflow more reliable.

Make one important workflow more reliable.

Make one important workflow more reliable.

Start with an affected customer job, the expected result and the evidence your team would accept.

Discuss a concrete workflow ↗