Self-guided worksheet. This reading edition provides questions and evidence criteria. It does not calculate a score, produce a radar chart, compare peers, save answers, email results or generate a PDF.

Decide which workflow deserves the next investment by examining its current outcome, constraints and evidence. Use this worksheet in a team discussion; it is not a peer ranking.

How to use it

Choose one workflow. For each question, record the answer, source, owner, date, gap and next check in your team’s document. Use “unknown” when the evidence is absent. Repeat after a material workflow change to compare your own records.

Where is value expected?

Name the customer job and the operating measure that should change.

Evidence to collect: Current throughput, cycle time, quality or loss, with its source and time window.

What is already running?

Separate a deployed workflow from a pilot, a purchased seat or an unused feature.

Evidence to collect: Agent or tool inventory, actual users, execution records and the responsible owner.

What blocks useful adoption?

Distinguish missing capability, poor workflow fit, low trust and absent authority.

Evidence to collect: A concrete failed or abandoned job and the point where work returned to a person.

Which opportunity goes first?

Compare one bounded change with its dependencies and failure cost.

Evidence to collect: The expected result, required access, review burden and stop condition.

How will you know it helped?

Choose the acceptance evidence before you change the workflow.

Evidence to collect: A baseline and later comparable customer jobs, including recovery effort and excluded work.

Turn the gaps into a bounded next step

Start with the most consequential unresolved job. Agree what would establish a better result, test the correction, and retain the source and outcome limits.

Use the reliability workflow worksheet · Explore Tensile · Discuss a concrete workflow