Self-guided worksheet. This reading edition provides questions and evidence criteria. It does not calculate a score, produce a radar chart, compare peers, save answers, email results or generate a PDF.

Use the questions to expose evidence gaps in a live workflow. Answer with a source and an owner rather than an unsupported confidence rating.

How to use it

Choose one workflow. For each question, record the answer, source, owner, date, gap and next check in your team’s document. Use “unknown” when the evidence is absent. Repeat after a material workflow change to compare your own records.

Ownership

Who can authorize, change, stop and accept the agent’s work?

Evidence to collect: Named operating and technical owners with recorded decision authority.

Policy coverage

Which written rules have checks, and which remain manual?

Evidence to collect: An expectation-to-check map with unsupported conditions explicitly retained.

Production visibility

Can the team investigate the first upstream failure?

Evidence to collect: Linked executions, business context and authoritative effects, with freshness limits.

Release discipline

What prevents an untested correction from becoming a new failure?

Evidence to collect: Reviewed changes, counterexamples and baseline/candidate tests across relevant tool states.

Customer result

What proves that the original job is complete?

Evidence to collect: Independent result evidence and any required owner acknowledgment, including recovery work.

Turn the gaps into a bounded next step

Start with the most consequential unresolved job. Agree what would establish a better result, test the correction, and retain the source and outcome limits.

Use the reliability workflow worksheet · Explore Tensile · Discuss a concrete workflow